Социальное участие молодежи в социокультурном развитии городов России и постсоветских стран: компаративный анализ потенциала и моделей управления

Social Sciences

1. social participation 95%
2. participation 70%
3. Armenia 55%
4. Russia 53%
5. non-profit-organization 43%
6. youth policy 30%
7. management 29%
8. resident 18%
9. Romania 17%
10. project management 17%
11. national culture 16%
12. citizen 16%
13. resources 14%
14. student 14%
15. Poland 14%
16. inhabitant 13%
17. public administration 13%
18. interaction 11%
19. semantics 11%
20. experience 11%
21. social network 11%
22. municipality 11%
23. volunteerism 10%
24. Sports 10%
25. social planning 9%
26. trend 9%
27. event 8%
28. coproduction 8%
29. methodology 8%
30. non-profit sector 8%
31. civil servant 8%
32. urban research 7%
33. organization 7%
34. expert 7%
35. technical literature 7%
36. management counsulting 7%
37. living conditions 7%
38. research method 7%
39. employee 6%
40. evaluation 6%
41. expert survey 6%
42. public service 6%
43. music 6%
44. sustainable development 6%
45. organizational structure 5%
46. determinism 5%
47. recreational activity 5%
48. education 5%
49. interdisciplinarity 5%
50. time 5%
51. UNO 5%
52. leader 5%
53. genocide 5%
54. interdisciplinary research 5%
55. university 5%
56. district 5%