ЕЩЕ РАЗ ОБ ИМПЕРИИ ГНЕЯ ПОМПЕЯ [

科研成果: Article同行评审

摘要

The author of the article contests the hypothesis advanced by A.V. Koptev that in the late 80s and in 70s BC Pompey was not a privatus cum imperio, but had twice obtained praetorship and thereby held military commands. It is argued in the article that the theoretical model of imperium and its relationship with auspicia and lex curiata developed by A.V. Koptev contains inherent logical contradictions, and the evidence on which it is based is characterized elsewhere as unreliable by A.V. Koptev himself. Besides, his analysis of the political events of the last decades of the Republic contains a number of factual errors substantially undermining his argumentation. Finally, A.V. Koptev has not succeeded in refuting convincingly the bulk of ancient evidence according to which Pompey had been privatus cum imperio before his first consulship. The author of the article considers improbable A.V. Koptev’s view that all this evidence does not reflect the reality, but only political propaganda.
投稿的翻译标题POMPEY’S IMPERIUM REVISITED
源语言Russian
页(从-至)75-99
页数25
期刊Vestnik drevnei istorii-Journal of ancient history
3
Published - 2014

GRNTI

  • 03.00.00 HISTORY AND HISTORICAL SCIENCES

Level of Research Output

  • VAK List

指纹

探究 'ЕЩЕ РАЗ ОБ ИМПЕРИИ ГНЕЯ ПОМПЕЯ [' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此